Detail Word Spoils


agenda that did not go beyond the abolition of the  spoils  system and the installation of a merit system. Wilson 
system. FIGURE 10.16 This Thomas Nast political cartoon from 1877 criticizes the  spoils  system associated with President Andrew Jackson. (credit: “In memoriam—
patronage in the wake of twentieth century reform efforts. The  spoils  system came under severe criticism, even during the time 
those with the foresight to support the winning candidate. The  spoils  system continued at least until 1883 when the Pendleton Act 
heart of the matter was the struggle to limit the  spoils  system of rewarding political party members with government job 
B. Eaton, asserted, the reformers’ most fundamental critique of the  spoils  system was that under it “we have seen a 
and the quality of life. Old machine politics and the  spoils  system were blamed for every ill in society—inefficiency, 
and was a reaction to the negative effects of the  spoils  system with its lack of competence and susceptibility to 
then on, the practice that to the victors belong the  spoils  came to be established. Civil Service Reform: The assassination 
sit easily with tightly disciplined political parties competing for the  spoils  of government and that, whatever their disadvantages, small 
a term deriving from the phrase ‘to the victor, the  spoils’.  Spoils meant that successful candidates, including newly-elected presidents, 
and interviews. Weber was aware of the drawbacks of the  spoils  system characterized by extravagant expenditure, improprieties, technical deficiencies and 
of all, it reintroduced an una tantum version of the  spoils  system with regard not only to the general directors (
the dilemma was how to obtain both while eliminating the  spoils  system. Gradually, but perceptibly, the concept of merit became 
goals were to smite out “evil” as personified by the  spoils  system. Viewed historically and dispassionately, one could argue that 
by Lincoln Steffens (1904), these proponents of reform exposed corruption and  spoils  in major cities and in state government. The results 
not been conducive to social and economic development. Patronage and  spoils  may be useful for promoting political loyalty but they 
public practices, to see the insidious nature of corruption and  spoils  return in the guise of “contracting out.” Services provided 
been possible through merit and professional performance, whereas patronage and  spoils  systems have had the opposite effects. However, this article 
through constitutionally ordained means), each new regime with a  spoils  system or some variation of it replaces many government 
numbers of appointed officials. The Mexican version of a  spoils  system thus remains attractive to a variety of political 
the bureaucracy should not become politicized as happens in spoils  system, it is also necessary that its members should 
serious challenges facing Polish politicians today. An extensive system of  spoils  has been adopted and employed by each successive 
gap between the government and the agencies. There is no “ spoils  system” in Sweden in the sense of changes in 
or not especially competent. Even if there is no “ spoils  system” in Sweden, a rather significant number of the 
s allegiance. Almost all middle and upper administrative posts are  spoils  of the new government. Though protected from summary dismissal 
with the occupation practice of appointing “friendly” Cubans, a Cuban  spoils  system operated until 1958. Its characteristics included purges of elected 
to see the city’s administration as a conduit for  spoils  rather than as a mechanism for efficient and effective 
expected, but also not desirable: since the possession of power  spoils  necessarily the free judgment of reason.” (Translation by P.
loyalty of members of the higher-level bureaucracy. American-style  spoils  systems have not been universally adopted and, starting in 
system. In the 1800s, the process was known as the “ spoils  system.” Attributed to New York Senator William Marcy, the 
debated. The nation has swung from extremes of responsiveness (unmitigated  spoils)  to extreme neutrality (the early twentieth century). Each time, 
astutely used patronage to assure loyalty to the Union. Without  spoils,  it is not certain that the United States would